Moore’s Law and Neoteny

Moore’s law makes cultural change slow down since each generation’s perspective is preserved longer due to neoteny. The trade off for each generation is that imagination, hope and innocence gives way to selfishness, irritability and as we are seeing now outright devouring your children:

The assertion that Moore’s law, a concept from the field of computer science, has an impact on cultural change, neoteny, and generational perspectives is an interesting perspective. It’s important to clarify that Moore’s law refers to the observation made by Gordon Moore in 1965 that the number of transistors on integrated circuits doubles approximately every two years, leading to a rapid increase in computing power and technological advancement. This essay will delve into the proposed idea, discussing the potential implications and exploring its relationship with cultural change and generational perspectives.

Moore’s Law and Technological Advancement:

Moore’s law has undoubtedly fueled rapid technological advancement, reshaping various aspects of society from communication and education to healthcare and entertainment. This acceleration in technology has had significant implications for how individuals interact, learn, and perceive the world around them. However, drawing a direct link between Moore’s law and its impact on cultural change requires further examination.

Cultural Change and Generational Perspectives:

The concept of neoteny, which refers to the retention of juvenile traits into adulthood, has been suggested as a potential factor influencing generational perspectives. If we consider the argument that Moore’s law has contributed to neoteny by extending the preservation of each generation’s perspective, it raises questions about how this interaction might impact cultural evolution.

Trade-offs and Social Dynamics:

The assertion that neoteny slows down cultural change raises the issue of trade-offs. While technological advancements may indeed prolong the exposure to certain ideas and values, it’s essential to remember that cultural change is complex and influenced by multiple factors. Each generation’s perspective is a product of its historical context, upbringing, and exposure to new information. The extended influence of certain perspectives might be offset by the influx of information from various sources, including new media, international communication, and diverse societal interactions.

The Generation Gap:

The idea that each generation’s perspective is preserved longer could lead to the continuation of generational divides, sometimes referred to as the “generation gap.” This gap represents differences in values, beliefs, and attitudes between generations. While some level of generational diversity can lead to progress and innovation, it’s also important for societies to find common ground and foster understanding between different age groups.

Imagination, Hope, and Selfishness:

The notion that generational preservation leads to a transition from imagination, hope, and innocence to selfishness and irritability suggests a linear progression that might not capture the full complexity of human behavior. While some individuals may indeed become more cynical with age, others continue to exhibit imagination, hope, and a sense of innocence well into adulthood. These traits are influenced by personal experiences, societal contexts, and individual personalities, making them difficult to generalize across generations.


The relationship between Moore’s law, cultural change, neoteny, and generational perspectives is a complex one. While technological advancements can certainly influence societal norms and communication patterns, it’s important to recognize that cultural evolution is shaped by a multitude of interconnected factors. The assertion that Moore’s law leads to the slowing down of cultural change due to neoteny raises intriguing questions but requires more nuanced exploration. In understanding how generations interact and how societies evolve, it’s crucial to consider the intricate interplay between technology, culture, and human nature.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *