Yes, movie studios, car companies, and newspapers often face challenges when it comes to adapting to new technologies due to their established distribution systems. These industries have traditionally relied on specific distribution channels and structures that have been in place for many years. The introduction of new technologies disrupts these established systems and requires significant adjustments.
For movie studios, the shift from traditional cinema releases to online streaming platforms has been a significant transformation. The rise of streaming services like Netflix and later Disney+ has changed the way audiences consume movies and TV shows. While some studios have successfully adapted to this shift, others have struggled to keep pace with the changing landscape and have faced difficulties in finding the right balance between traditional theatrical releases and digital distribution.
Similarly, car companies have faced challenges as the automotive industry undergoes technological advancements. The rise of electric vehicles, autonomous driving, and shared mobility services has disrupted the traditional model of car manufacturing and distribution. Established car companies often find it difficult to adapt their manufacturing processes, dealer networks, and sales strategies to accommodate these emerging technologies and changing consumer preferences.
News companies have also grappled with the impact of technology on their distribution models. The shift from print to digital platforms has fundamentally changed the way news is consumed and monetized. Traditional newspapers have faced declining circulation and advertising revenues as readers increasingly turn to online news sources and social media platforms. Adapting to digital distribution requires news organizations to rethink their business models, find new revenue streams, and navigate the challenges of competing in the fast-paced online news ecosystem.
While the longstanding distribution systems of these industries have provided them with established structures, customer bases, and revenue streams, they can also hinder their ability to adapt quickly to disruptive technologies. Newer distribution systems, driven by technology, often lack the legacy infrastructure but offer the advantage of agility and the ability to leverage evolving consumer preferences. However, they may face challenges in building up a comprehensive catalog, establishing consensus, or having ready-made structures in place.
In conclusion, movie studios, car companies, and newspapers do face difficulties in adjusting to technology due to their longstanding distribution systems. The shift towards disruptive distribution models requires them to rethink their strategies, adapt their operations, and find new ways to engage with their audiences. While the established industries have their strengths, the disruptive technologies often offer advantages in terms of agility and the ability to adapt to changing consumer demands. Finding a balance between the legacy structures and the innovative distribution systems is crucial for these industries to thrive in the evolving technological landscape.
You’re correct that new disruptive distribution systems may face challenges in generating a comprehensive catalog, establishing consensus, or having ready-made structures in place. These aspects are often built over time by established industries with longstanding distribution systems. Disruptive technologies and distribution models, being relatively new, may not have the same level of infrastructure and established networks initially.
When it comes to generating a catalog, established industries like movie studios, car companies, and newspapers have accumulated a vast library of content or products over the years. This extensive catalog contributes to their brand value and provides a wide range of options for consumers. In contrast, disruptive distribution systems may start with a limited selection of content or products, requiring time and effort to build up a comparable catalog.
Consensus plays an important role in industries with longstanding distribution systems. Movie studios, for example, have established relationships with theater chains, distributors, and other industry stakeholders. They have agreed-upon standards, release windows, and revenue-sharing models that have evolved over time. Disruptive distribution systems often need to navigate and negotiate these existing structures to gain acceptance and reach a consensus with the established players.
Ready-made structures, such as dealer networks for car companies or distribution networks for newspapers, have been developed and refined by established industries over decades. These structures provide logistical support, customer reach, and brand presence. Disruptive distribution systems may lack these established structures initially, requiring them to invest time and resources to build a comparable network and infrastructure.
However, it’s important to note that disruptive distribution systems have the advantage of agility and flexibility. They can adapt quickly to changing consumer preferences and leverage innovative technologies to create new experiences. Over time, they may develop their own catalog, establish consensus through collaborations or partnerships, and build efficient structures that suit their unique business models.
In summary, while disruptive distribution systems may face challenges in generating a catalog, establishing consensus, or having ready-made structures like established industries, they have the advantage of agility and the potential to disrupt traditional norms. As they evolve and mature, they can overcome these initial limitations and develop their own catalog, consensus, and structures that align with their innovative approach to distribution.