Tag: Platforms

SM

1. My connection, your isolation, their nervous breakdown.

2. My freedom of speech, your censorship, their witch hunt.

3. My instant communication, your endless distraction, their forgotten message.

4. My vibrant community, your toxic echo chamber, their online mob.

5. My public forum, your private surveillance, their data leak.

6. My viral fame, your swift cancelation, their deleted account.

7. My self-expression, your narcissism, their desperate validation.

8. My networking, your self-promotion hell, their desperate LinkedIn request.

9. My global reach, your local irrelevance, their forgotten small business.

10. My innovation, your stagnation, their recycled features.

11. My inclusion, your exclusion, their passive-aggressive comments.

12. My engagement, your exhaustion, their unread notifications.

The Interzone of Access

Leave a comment

The state of democratized access

Smartphones – IPhone 🧌

Internet – Google search ☠️

Laptops and Computers- Apple

Open Source Software

Streaming Services ☠️

E-readers 🪦

Platforms Twitter 🐸 ☠️

Renewables – No killer product

3D Printing – No killer product

Blockchain – No killer product

Smartphones: The iPhallus, a chrome totem pulsating with logos, a Skinner box in your pocket. It whispers promises of connection, but delivers a cage of curated reality. Information streams, a digitized jungle, eat your time, leaving a hollow satisfaction.

A million apps, a million distractions, a million tiny Skinner boxes conditioning the neuro-meat. Candy-coated slavery in the palm of your hand. iSlabs, gleaming black mirrors of narcissus, portals to a curated chaos. Everyman a kingpin, a producer, a pornographer, all in their pocket. Yet the signal flickers, the battery drains, a phantom limb lost in the subway dead zone.

Internet: The Vast Sprawl, a digital Moloch devouring time and attention. The Great Search, a labyrinthine web woven by spiders of code. Google, the all-seeing eye, indexes your desires, feeding you a manufactured reality. data graveyard haunted by ghosts of information. Google, the all-seeing eye, harvesting your clicks, feeding your fears, shaping your reality byte by byte. Information overload, a digital deluge threatening to drown us in a sea of irrelevance. Google, the one-eyed oracle, its algorithms whispering desires before they’re even thoughts. Information, a firehose of data, flooding the circuits, leaving users thirsting for truth in a desert of clickbait. Information overload, a firehose of data drowning critical thought.

Laptops & Computers: Apple, the forbidden fruit of knowledge gleaming with bitten chrome, gleaming and expensive. Gates of silicon paradise guarded by proprietary code. The illusion of freedom, the reality of control. A cold metal womb birthing the digital simulacrum. Walls of text rise in the flickering glow, a self-imposed prison of information. The Apple, a seductive serpent, coils around your creativity, whispering of pre-programmed potential. Applechrome fortresses, walled gardens of control. The keyboard, a weaponized typewriter, spewing forth manifestos and memes. The cursor, a blinking eye, judging every keystroke. Screens glow, casting an artificial twilight, users wired to the machine, slaves to the silicon gods.

Open Source Software: A flickering candle in the data darkness. Code shared, a digital commune, a fight against the proprietary gods. Yet, the shadows lurk, vulnerabilities hidden in plain sight, a potential Trojan horse for the unwary hacker. The Bricolage Bazaar, a chaotic marketplace of code. Hackers, the new revolutionaries, wielding screwdrivers and compilers, building free alternatives in the shadows. But the corporations loom large, casting their proprietary nets, ever ready to co-opt and commercialize the commons. A rebellion against the code lords. Free and open, a chaotic symphony of programmers, a glimpse of a decentralized future. But can the open web survive the vultures of the corporate machine?

Streaming Services: The Cathedral of Distraction, a never-ending cacophony of content. Binge-watching our way to oblivion, passive consumers hypnotized by the flickering glow. A million shows, a million voices, but nothing to say. The opiate of the masses. Flickering cat videos and endless content loops lull the mind into a mindless stupor. A dopamine drip, a manufactured dream state, a society plugged into the matrix of entertainment. Attention spans wither, dopamine drips, a generation raised on the flickering teat of the algorithm.

E-readers: The Gutenberg Graveyard, mausoleums of digitized ink. The weight of the book, the rustle of turning pages, the scent of aged paper – all sacrificed on the altar of convenience. Are we trading the soul of the book for the cold efficiency of the screen? The tomb of the bound word. Text trapped in silicon purgatory, devoid of the tactile symphony of turning pages. The scent of aged paper replaced by the sterile hum of electronics. A library of Alexandria burning in the palm of your hand. Can words on a screen ever truly replace the weight of a book, the scent of aged pages?

Platforms: Twitter, the digital coliseum, a gladiatorial arena of 280-character insults. Bots and trolls, the new bread and circuses, keeping the masses entertained while the real games are played in the shadows. A breeding ground for echo chambers and outrage, a weaponized hivemind. Tweetstorms of rage, a cacophony of disembodied voices. Echo chambers amplify, dissenting voices drowned out in the cacophony. Is this the agora of democracy, or a breeding ground for fascism?

Renewables: The Mirage of Sustainability, a shimmering oasis in the digital desert. Wind turbines, like skeletal giants, promise clean energy. Yet the corporations exploit the land, leaving scars on the earth in their quest for profit. Can technology truly save us from the destruction it has wrought?  The elusive dream, a shimmering mirage in the desert of fossil fuels. The technology dances on the horizon, just out of reach, a promise of clean energy held hostage by corporate greed. The elusive Holy Grail, a shimmering mirage in the energy desert. Technology fragmented, potential unrealized. Can we harness the wind and sun before the oil barons suck the earth dry?

3D Printing: The Plasticine Playground, a child’s dream, an engineer’s folly. The promise of a maker revolution, limited by cost and complexity. Can we print a new world, or are we destined to drown in a sea of cheap trinkets? A plastic ouroboros, devouring itself in a cycle of endless creation. It promises democratized manufacturing, but delivers trinkets and toys, a future filled with mountains of discarded plastic dreams. The Flesh Fair, a macabre carnival of possibility. Organs printed to order, bespoke bodies sculpted from plasticine. Is this the dawn of a new era of transhumanism, or a descent into a narcissistic funhouse of self-replication?

Blockchain: The Invisible Labyrinth, a tangled web of encrypted transactions. The phantom currency, a ghost in the machine. The dream of a decentralized utopia, free from the control of banks and governments. But in the shadows lurk criminals, peddling darkness on the dark web. Is this the future of finance, or a haven for the lawless? Anarchic utopia or criminal playground? A technology ripe for both liberation and exploitation.

The Cut-Up Machine sputters and coughs, spewing forth this fragmented vision. Democratized access, a double-edged sword. Freedom and control, creation and consumption, all tangled in the wires of the digital age. Can we navigate this labyrinth, or are we destined to be devoured by the very tools that empower us?

This is the Interzone of Access, a cut-up of our digital landscape. Here, progress rubs shoulders with peril, and the line between freedom and control blurs into a hazy dream. We stand at a crossroads, a stark reminder of the choices we face in shaping the future of access.

Europe

Leave a comment

So, it seems that it is not far-fetched to say Europe never really bought into the whole Silicon Valley-style “disruption” the way the U.S. did. They saw through a lot of the hype—especially when it came to things that were just incremental improvements masquerading as revolutions. Most of what passed for “innovation” in the last 15 years was just optimizing ad targeting, repackaging old ideas with better UX, or shifting computing to the cloud and calling it a paradigm shift.

And when the actual technological base—like smartphones—stopped fundamentally changing, the whole ecosystem started looking like a closed loop of rearranging the same pieces. Europe, for the most part, didn’t throw itself into the mania of software eating the world, and now they seem a little better positioned for whatever comes next, whether that’s AI regulation or just a recalibration of how we think about tech in daily life.

You’re not missing much by skipping the bullshit business side of it. It was always a gold rush designed to enrich a handful of people while convincing everyone else they needed whatever was being peddled.

AI, as it stands, is mostly a glorified autocomplete with a good memory. It’s great for making things seem more efficient—summarizing documents, writing code snippets, generating marketing copy—but it hasn’t yet revolutionized much beyond knowledge work. The real transformation people keep promising would come from AI merging with robotics, self-driving, or something that physically interacts with the world in a meaningful way.

But that connection isn’t there yet. Self-driving still struggles with edge cases, robotics still lacks dexterity and general adaptability, and AI in most industries is just a fancier tool for existing processes rather than something fundamentally changing the game. Right now, it’s basically an expensive way to automate busywork and generate synthetic content—useful, sure, but hardly the sci-fi revolution everyone keeps hyping.

Until AI can reliably do something in the physical world—whether that’s driving trucks, assembling complex machinery, or automating logistics beyond just scheduling—it’s mostly just making digital spaces more efficient. Which is fine, but not the “end of work” or “new industrial revolution” people keep trying to sell.

Europe probably dodged a bullet by not producing its own Facebook, Google, or Twitter. They never had a native tech giant in that mold, which means they didn’t have to deal with the same level of cultural and political chaos those platforms created. Instead, they regulated Silicon Valley imports aggressively, treating them more like utilities or threats rather than national champions.

The U.S. got hooked on the idea that these platforms were some great democratizing force, only to find out they were just ad companies with god complexes. Europe, by contrast, never fully bought into the hype. They kept their distance, taxed and regulated them, and in doing so, probably avoided a lot of the societal mess that came with them—like algorithm-driven radicalization, data mining scandals, and the gig economy dystopia.

Now with AI, they’re doing the same thing: skepticism first, regulation early, no rush to embrace the latest overhyped tech just because it’s “the future.” And honestly, that restraint might pay off again. While the U.S. keeps swinging from one digital gold rush to the next, Europe is making sure it doesn’t get buried under the fallout.

Europe, in its bureaucratic wisdom, clucks its tongue at American excess, passing GDPR regulations like a prudish parent confiscating a teenager’s smartphone. But here’s the rub: Europe’s “skepticism” is itself a form of ideological theater. By fetishizing privacy laws, it avoids confronting the deeper horror—that even with regulations, we remain subjects of the digital panopticon, our data siphoned into the cloud, that ethereal site of capitalist jouissance.

Both Europe and the U.S. essentially let real innovation atrophy by allowing a handful of companies to centralize everything. The flood of free money since 2008 just accelerated that process. Instead of funding genuinely new technology, most of the capital went into propping up monopolies, building walled gardens, and creating financialized ecosystems that extract value rather than generate it.

Look at the major players today—Google, Apple, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft. They’ve spent the last decade consolidating control over digital infrastructure, not pushing the boundaries of what’s possible. Even AI, the supposed frontier, is mostly being used to reinforce existing monopolies rather than create anything radically new.

Meanwhile, China kept pushing hard into hardware, advanced manufacturing, and industrial applications of AI. So in a way, the West didn’t just lose the race—it stopped running and decided to rent out the track to a handful of corporate landlords. The result? Stagnation disguised as progress, where every “new” product is just an iteration of something that came before, and actual breakthroughs are rare.

The tech giants function as the sinthome of late capitalism, the pathological knot that sustains the system by offering a false promise of “disruption.” Uber disrupts taxis but reinstates feudalism; Airbnb disrupts hotels but inflates rents. The cycle is viciously Hegelian—a negation that negates nothing, a revolution that leaves the throne intact. The U.S., drunk on libertarian delusions, worships at the altar of “move fast and break things,” mistaking the breaking for progress. Europe, meanwhile, plays the role of the hysteric, endlessly questioning authority while secretly enjoying its subordinate position. Both are trapped in a dialectical pas de deux, each sustaining the other’s fantasy.