Tag: geopolitics

Poker, Chess, Bridge, and Go

Leave a comment

Everyone talks about the game as if there’s only one.

But there are at least four.

Four players. Four strategies. Four clocks.

All layered over the same world like mismatched transparencies.

The United States deals in poker—fast, brash, bluff-heavy. It thrives on leverage, spectacle, and calculated risk. Winning isn’t about holding the best hand—it’s about making you fold first.

Europe plays bridge—a game of rules and rituals, of coordination and consensus. The process matters more than the result. Power is exercised gently, through alliances and restraint.

Russia thinks in chess—slow, methodical, sacrificial. It’s a game of control and endurance, where history dictates strategy and patience is power.

China moves like Go—fluid, expansive, indirect. Influence accumulates quietly, stone by stone, until encirclement becomes destiny.

Each power sees its own logic as universal.

Each believes it’s winning—on its own terms, in its own time.

But when four different games are played on the same board, what unfolds isn’t competition—it’s collision.

And what follows a collision? Maybe transformation.

Or maybe nothing at all.

Not every game ends.

Some just get abandoned.

America: Poker & Speed Capital / Illusion Capital / Casino Capital

It’s the homeland of the bluff, the leveraged bet, the marketing pitch disguised as policy. The U.S. doesn’t need a perfect hand—it just needs you to think it has one. Its aces are aircraft carriers, Silicon Valley, and a Hollywood smile. It prints chips in the form of dollars and debt ceilings. Power flows through networks, and the real action’s in the margins. If it loses, it flips the table, declares a reset, and calls it innovation.

This is speed-run capitalism.

Born in the fire of Wall Street and raised by algorithms in Silicon Valley.

It’s short-term, liquid, attention-based, and high-stakes—like poker.

Value is what people think it is, for as long as they think it. Hype becomes product. Finance eats industry. The market is always open, and it’s hungry for stories, not substance.

It’s not about real value; it’s about perceived value—until exit. Hype becomes product. Attention is currency. The IPO is the endgame.

Mantra: “Move fast, break things, IPO before the rubble cools.”

Worships: Disruption, branding, speed.

Hates: Regulation, downtime, introspection.

It doesn’t aim for stability—it wants exit velocity.

Europe: Bridge & Regulatory Capital/ Guilt Capital / Hedged Capital

Ah yes—the Europeans.

The Europeans are playing Bridge—

Bridge: a game of partnerships, signaling, and mutual restraint.

Everyone follows rules. Everyone agrees to pretend that consensus isn’t theater. The game is elegant, but glacial. Each move requires a committee, a quorum, and a press conference. Strategy isn’t domination—it’s not rocking the boat.

Where the U.S. bluffs, Russia schemes, and China encircles, Europe negotiates.

That’s both its strength and its downfall.

Europe excels at preserving peace—just not at projecting power.

The game is to preserve the game.

Call it Capitalism with an asterisk.

It’s capitalism that apologizes, that wants to save the planet and still make a return. It tries to humanize the machine while staying in the race. ESG, GDPR, carbon credits, circular economies—it wants to believe that capitalism can be reconciled with morality, ecology, and philosophy. And maybe it can. But not at the speed or scale the other players are moving.

Worships: Sustainability, soft power, cultural capital.

Hates: Chaos, coercion, Silicon Valley arrogance, Moscow unpredictability.

Mantra: “There must be a middle way.”

It doesn’t conquer. It cultivates.

But cultivation takes time, and the climate clock is ticking.

What is Bridge?

Bridge is a card game of partnerships, precision, etiquette, and invisible language. Four players, two teams of two. The game is built on cooperation—but with strict rules and coded communication. It’s about reading your partner without speaking, bidding without bluffing, and playing with mathematical precision and trust.

You don’t win by surprise or brute force—you win by being better coordinated and more disciplined.

In Bridge:

• You can’t act alone. Like the EU—no one member state wins without alignment.

• Strategy is cautious, not explosive. Like Europe’s soft power diplomacy.

• The rules matter more than the outcome. Procedure is sacred.

• Miscommunication is fatal. Just like EU politics.

• Winning is less important than avoiding disaster. Sound familiar?

And it’s not about fast hands or lucky draws—it’s about shared understanding and common cause. It’s slow, sophisticated, rule-bound. French in its elegance, German in its structure, Italian in its flair for partnership, Spanish in its patience. You could say Europe plays Bridge while arguing about which language to use to describe the game.

Russia: Chess & Extraction Capital

Not the quick, online blitz kind. No—this is analog chess, Soviet-era, with heavy pieces on a blood-colored board. Every move is deliberate, historical, and twice removed from the obvious. Russia doesn’t play to win quickly—it plays not to lose permanently. A pawn sacrificed in Donbas might set up a bishop maneuver in Berlin ten years down the line. The Kremlin isn’t concerned with glory; it’s focused on not being checkmated by history. Again. Every piece has a role, and every move is calculated. It’s about positional advantage, traps, and sacrifices for a longer-term plan. Power is centralized, and strategy is often reactive—waiting for the opponent to make a mistake. ⸻

This is post-collapse capitalism, forged in the vacuum of empire.

Scarcity is the rule, and the game is control—not growth.

It’s state-adjacent, kleptocratic, deeply personal. Power and wealth are held like territory. Trust is zero. Security is everything.

Worships: Resource monopolies, vertical power, old networks, fortress economies.

Hates: Transparency, decentralization, unpredictability.

Mantra: “Own the pipe. Own the port. Own the guy who counts the money.”

It doesn’t scale. It consolidates.

China: Go & Harmony Capital

The oldest game. Stones placed one by one, quietly, almost ritualistically. It’s not about a single decisive strike, but slow encirclement. Patience reigns. You place one stone at a time, quietly expanding influence until control becomes inevitable. The game rewards subtlety and long-term vision over theatrics.

At first, it looks like nothing. A factory here, a port there. A language app, a social media platform. A satellite constellation. Then you blink, and half the board is under soft control. China’s power is not a punch—it’s a pressure. It doesn’t ask if you want to join; it assumes you’ll come around once all other options dissolve. Its moves span dynasties, not fiscal quarters.

No shock, no awe.

Just slow, strategic pressure

This is engineered capitalism, aligned with state and civilization.

It’s slow, coordinated, massive. Not a casino, not a smash-and-grab—but a hydraulic system.

Worships: Scale, planning, coordination, social stability.

Hates: Disorder, volatility, foreign dependence.

Mantra: “Invest in the terrain, and the terrain will shape the battle.”

It doesn’t speculate. It accumulates.

It’s engineered, infrastructural, civilizational.

<>

So here we are:

Four games. Three timelines. A shattered board.

Each power believes it’s winning—by its own rules, on its own clock.

But geopolitics now runs on split-screen time:

America plays in T1: the eternal now. Twitch-speed history. Quarterly earnings, campaign cycles, and the dopamine drip of newsfeeds. No memory, no future—only monetized immediacy. Europe lives in T1.5: the curated present. Too slow for T1, too fast for T2, too fragmented for T3. A museum of modernity, where every new idea must pass through ten committees and twelve translations. Russia operates in T2: the haunted long now. Strategy is sedimented memory. Collapse, resurrection, invasion—it’s all part of the same story. Victory means outlasting. China plays in T3: the deep continuum. Not five-year plans—500-year arcs. Dynastic patience. Planetary infrastructure. It’s not just building a future—it’s building the terrain that defines the future.

What happens when T1, T2, and T3 share a battlefield?

Noise. Friction. Collapse of meaning.

Noise. Friction. Strategic incomprehension.

Like playing Go on a chessboard with poker chips.

No common rules.

No shared tempo.

Just feedback loops and overlapping crises.

It’s like trying to play Go on a chessboard with poker chips. You don’t just get confusion—you get emergent chaos. Nobody’s speaking the same strategic language, but all of them are armed.

Worse: the infrastructure of the world—finance, code, diplomacy, climate—is buckling under the load of simultaneous timeframes. What feels like a miscalculation in T1 is a provocation in T2 and a pattern in T3. There are no “global norms” anymore—only feedback loops, entropy, and a thousand satellites watching everyone play themselves into checkmate.

And into this mess steps the real wildcard:

Non-state actors. AI. Climate. The Post-human stack.

They don’t play any of these games.

They don’t even play games.

They rewrite the board.

Non-Euclidean Politics

Leave a comment

Trapped in the Symbolic Order:

They peddle their ideologies like used cars on a Martian lot – left wing, right wing, all rusted-out Lacaninan signifiers with a Symbolic Order malfunction. Stuck in their pre-Imaginary world, these Euclidean politicians can’t grasp the writhing, pulsating Real of realpolitik. They see the world as a goddamn line graph, a straight shot from the Name-of-the-Father to a future forever out of reach, blissfully unaware of the jouissance, the non-Euclidean desires that lurk just beyond their field of vision.

Desiring-Machines and the Rhizome:

They try to shove everything into their neat little boxes, these politicians. Left, right, up, down. A phallic stage mentality for a reality that’s gone Deleuzian. Like trying to navigate the body without a body map. A flatland mentality for a reality that’s gone nova. Like trying to navigate the Interzone with a compass from Sears. The real issues are writhing serpents, man. Issues with fangs and forked tongues, slithering through dimensions your pea-brained pundits can’t even conceive. The real issues are desiring-machines, man. Issues with a thousand intensities and becomings, slithering through the social networks your pea-brained pundits can’t even conceive. The economy? A tangled assemblage of flows and deterritorializations, a virus burrowing into the desiring-production of the system. War? A schizophrenic assemblage of power plays, fueled by the death drive and fueled by profit, all projected onto a smooth space in your living room.

The Fantasy of the Neutral:

These Euclidean suits, they drone on about “compromise,” the sweet melody of the Imaginary. Imaginary middle ground of what, citizen-subject? The middle ground of a Möbius strip? You step one way, you end up where you started, only seeing the world a little more reified. A grey mush, a neutering of all that’s vital and desiring. They sand down the jagged edges of the Real, leaving us with bland, featureless superego ideals that wouldn’t choke a maggot.

Power:

Power, they say, is a straight line, a binary between two opposing forces. But power is a desiring-machine, my friends, a rhizomatic web of control apparatuses, assemblages, and viral memes. It flows through the cracks, infects subjectivities, deterritorializes realities. You can’t hold it in your meaty little fists, can’t pin it down with your Euclidean logic.

Beyond the Binary:

They shove these binary buttons down your throat, Red or Blue, Left or Right. Flatland politics, a Symbolic Order nightmare where everything’s measured in straight lines and empty signifiers. Politicians, slick snakes in ill-fitting suits, slithering across the body without organs of power, promising a one-size-fits-all future.

The Third Mind of the Electorate

The Third Mind of the electorate, buzzing with revolutionary potential, can’t be captured in a two-party system. It craves a Deleuzian rhizomatic approach, a politics twisted and warped like a desiring-machine assemblage.

Power’s a Junkie’s Fix:

Power, they crave. Power’s a junkie’s fix, man. A hit of control, a rush of domination. But power in this nova landscape? It’s a desiring-machine, a word with a thousand meanings depending on which assemblage you’re plugged into. The media, the corporations, the military-industrial complex – these are the real desiring-machines, their rhizomes reaching out, shaping the game from the shadows.

Hacking the System:

So what’s a citizen-subject to do? Forget the damn voting booths, those sterile little cubicles where you choose the flavor of the symbolic order. We need to break free from the grid, man. We need to cultivate our own psychic antennae, a desiring-machine to navigate the chaos. Hack the system from the inside, plant seeds of subversion in the feedback loops. Disrupt the script, flood the airwaves with word salad and cut-up manifestos. Maybe then, just maybe, we can start to see the Real, the one hidden behind the static of Euclidean politics.

The Interzone and the Body Without Organs:

The real action happens down in the Interzone, in the murky soup of desire and fear. Here, the grey men in black suits whisper promises of control, while shadowy figures scrawl graffiti on the social fabric itself. Here, ideologies mutate faster than a body without organs in a nuclear wasteland.

Forget the Pills, Embrace the Chaos:

Forget your left and right, your red and blue pills. We need a whole new pharmacy, a mind-bending cocktail of chaotic logic and non-linear solutions. We need politicians who can navigate the Mobius strip of reality. We gotta exploit the contradictions, weaponize the absurdity, turn their own doublespeak into a weapon against them.