Pigfuck and The Sisters of Mercy

“Our faith in the integrity of the system has been restored! After all, democracy is alive and well—as long as we’re on top, of course. It’s a beautiful thing, really: ballots counted, recounts recounted, audits audited, until—by some miracle of divine intervention—Republicans win! Then, and only then, is the system above reproach, a paragon of fairness, with not a shred of fraud to be found.

Funny how it works, isn’t it? Win, and we have the most secure election ever held. Lose, and suddenly the whole thing reeks of foul play, conspiracies lurking in every precinct. In short, elections are ‘stolen’ exactly as often as they are lost. Democracy, folks—it’s foolproof, provided you pick the right fools.”

Our “faith” in the integrity of the system has been restored—if, of course, by faith, we mean a cynical grin and a shot of bourbon while the clowns spin their wheels. This, my friends, is the greatest farce in the American political circus: Republicans hollering from the rooftops that democracy has been stolen from the People—until, by some celestial coin flip, they end up winning. Then, somehow, the entire operation is as pristine as a monk’s prayer book.

Think about it. The same bloodshot-eyed politicians who spent years spreading election paranoia like they were spreading manure suddenly morph into pious defenders of the very machine they’d spent so much time bashing. It’s as if the voting booths, those hallowed “sacred instruments of democracy,” become sanctified only when they turn out to be dispensers of red ballots. I can almost hear them: “Ah yes, the American people have spoken.” Right—so long as they’re speaking with a conservative accent.

But oh, when they lose, it’s suddenly the crime of the century! The earth shakes, the skies darken, and before you know it, the same officials who declared themselves the holy defenders of democracy are rampaging through their own playbook of conspiracies, frantically declaring it all a rigged spectacle. Out come the wild-eyed claims, the imaginary fraudsters, the phantoms of dead voters and ballot dumps—all so they don’t have to swallow the bitter pill of an election defeat. And yet, when they win, these problems magically evaporate.

The game is rigged, all right. But it’s not the ballot counters or the polling stations who are rigging it—it’s the spin doctors and fear-mongers. They’ve got a good racket going: win, and democracy is sacred; lose, and democracy is a lie. It’s a shell game, a three-ring carnival, and they’re selling you snake oil with one hand while they pick your pocket with the other. And every time you tune in, every time you let yourself get sucked into their pantomime of rage and righteousness, you’re just buying another ticket to the circus.

And then we have the Sisters of Mercy—our noble Democrats—tossing up their hands and bowing down to the almighty patriarchy of power and wealth, while still cooing sweet, syrupy promises to the poor sods who trusted them. Make no mistake, these so-called “champions of the people” are doing nothing but rolling over for every boardroom warlord and tech titan that dangles a dollar in their direction. They’re not so much a resistance as a pitiful curtsy—a bow to the billionaires, a nod to the corporations, a submissive little grin to anyone who’ll keep them fat and funded.

They prance around talking about “hope” and “change,” but what does that translate to? Just another soporific cocktail of half-measures and empty gestures, designed to keep the electorate in a cozy stupor while the corporate machinery churns on, louder than ever. They don’t earn the people’s trust; they leech off it, riding the coattails of progressive rhetoric while offering nothing substantial in return. Behind the scenes, they’re every bit as beholden to power as the villains they claim to oppose.

The reality is, they’ve perfected the art of symbolic resistance—a neat little trick where they stand in front of the cameras, shaking their fists, mouthing platitudes about “fighting for the common man,” all while giving the green light to the same backdoor deals and loophole-ridden legislation that feeds the beast. They’re not a counterforce to Republican corporate pandering; they’re the polished flip side, selling out with a smile, waving a rainbow flag while signing off on a corporate tax cut.

And they wonder why the electorate’s trust is thin as a politician’s spine.

But this is all comfort food for the periodic arrival of the real villains in this melodrama: the ethno-nationalist, fascist, pig-headed wing of the industrial-corporate complex. The Democratic Party may be complacent, but it’s the other side—the red-faced, boot-stomping maniacs—who take that complacency and turn it into a weapon. They’re the ones salivating on the sidelines, just waiting to take the reins of the machine, to twist and reshape it in their image, with slogans that smell of blood and soil.

The Democrats, bless them, think they’re holding the line, playing a noble game of resistance. But all they’re really doing is keeping the seat warm. Their tepid half-measures, their sanitized rhetoric, their cozy relationship with Wall Street—it all amounts to a mere intermission before the fascist show rolls back into town. They’re the warm-up act, lulling everyone into a sense of security so that when the hardliners show up with their chest-thumping nationalism and crude, industrial-strength authoritarianism, people are too dazed, too weary, to resist.

And the “villains,” these ethno-nationalist corporate beasts, they’re not here to play pretend. No, they don’t bow, they don’t nod politely to the corporate overlords—they are the overlords, unabashedly wielding power and privilege as a blunt instrument, smashing down anything or anyone who gets in their way. They aren’t beholden to the system; they want to own it outright, to reshape it into their own monstrous vision, where democracy is just a dusty word and the electorate is nothing more than a mass of consumers to be exploited or discarded.

So while the Sisters of Mercy are busy shuffling papers and mumbling slogans, the real threat is waiting in the wings, ready to barrel through with corporate backing and a base pumped full of rage and righteous ignorance. They’ve got no use for comfort or moderation, and the sad fact is, they’re not going anywhere. They’ll just keep coming back, riding on the waves of populist fury, dressed up as patriots, until the last semblance of democracy is a thin, fraying disguise for the ugly machinery grinding away underneath.

Home Buyers

Let me tell you, kids today just don’t get it. I hear all this whining about “sky-high home prices” and “crippling student debt,” and you know what I say? You’re just not thinking big enough. You want affordable housing? Well, why don’t we start thinking about something that actually works: a good old-fashioned, global conflict with high casualties and massive rebuilding efforts. That’s right—World War III. The ultimate economic equalizer. Trust me, you’ll thank me later.

I know what you’re thinking: “Oh, but war is bad! People die!” Sure, but that’s exactly what makes it work, right? Picture it—millions of people overseas and right here at home, suddenly “vacating” the housing market. And by “vacating,” I mean, you know…vacating. Inventory would skyrocket! Houses, apartments, mansions—heck, whole blocks—up for grabs, just sitting there waiting for a nice young couple like you to swing by and pick one up for peanuts.

And let’s not forget the perks. I mean, look at what my generation got out of it: the GI Bill! The government couldn’t stop throwing money at us. Free education, low-interest home loans, all the benefits you could dream of just for showing up and doing our part. You say you’re struggling with student loans? Well, back in my day, we didn’t have those issues because we had options, and those options involved a certain amount of strategically placed artillery fire.

And sure, there’s the unfortunate bit about population reduction—again, not ideal, but let’s not ignore the potential here. Think of the job market after a good solid war effort. Companies desperate for fresh faces, positions opening up everywhere, affordable housing all around. You millennials could finally get a foot in the door. You’d even have that cozy, “We fought for this country” glow that every interviewer loves to see.

Now, I know some of you might be squeamish about signing up for military service. But think about it this way: you’re doing your part to bring balance back to the market. And the best part is, with today’s technology, it’s all remote-controlled drones and cyber warfare. Who knows? Maybe you could fight this war from your living room while putting an offer on that charming fixer-upper down the street.

Oh, sweetheart, don’t get your hopes up too high. Sure, World War III might mean cheap houses and booming job markets—but you, personally? You’re probably not gonna make it anyway. Statistically speaking, odds aren’t exactly in your favor here. Not everyone gets to ride the post-apocalyptic real estate wave, okay?

So think of this as a selfless act. Maybe you’re not here to buy a house; maybe you’re here to clear out space for someone else to buy a house. Thank you for your service in, well… making room. You’re the “golden generation” now, the sacrifice, the hero. And honestly, that’s something.

And, hey, if you don’t, your sacrifice won’t be in vain. Your ashes will be sprinkled over a housing market that finally understands balance. You’ll be gone, but your memory? Immortal. Some lucky Gen Alpha kid will be raising their cappuccino to you from the downtown loft they snagged at foreclosure prices. Maybe they’ll even get a plaque for you out front—“In loving memory of those who couldn’t outbid an all-cash offer.”

Thank you for your service, by the way. Honestly. Now, take that golden glow and go, you know… fuck off.

Valencia Floods

www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcn

Oh, but it’s positively incredible how the people of Valencia clutch at the government’s skirts like lost children in a rainstorm! They actually expect warnings when a flood is on the way, as if nature itself should ring their doorbells. They imagine protocols will spring up to save them—protocols! Why, they could’ve simply popped to the market, where every manner of inflatable contraption was on sale: floating armchairs, luxury life vests bedazzled with faux diamonds, and even portable flood dams (although one wonders why they hadn’t bought two or three already). The market provides, after all! For just a month’s wages, one could’ve had a raft shaped like a giant swan or, better still, a Venetian gondola look-alike for that authentic submerged experience. Alas, they simply refuse to fend for themselves—how terribly misguided! The government is no life jacket, no matter how one puffs it up.

Well, yes, if the government must meddle, let it be in the form of good, solid tax breaks! Imagine the incentives: tax deductions on personal raft purchases, rebates for inflatable duckies, and perhaps a subsidy or two for the luxury yacht life preservers, fitted with GPS and faux-leather cupholders. They could set up a grant for entrepreneurial sorts to market high-end flood accessories—like waterproof Bluetooth speakers so people could float around in style, listening to Les Misérables as they drift through their very own barricades. Maybe even a small business loan for anyone wishing to open a boutique selling “Flood Essentials”—designer sandbags, artisanal buckets, and bespoke water wings in the latest hues of despair. That’s the kind of “support” the government should be offering! Anything else would simply distort the natural, self-correcting power of the market!

Now if you want solutions just ask the billionaires. Imagine, if you will, the Hyper-Sink: an architectural marvel that would funnel every drop of water right through the earth to the other side of the world—completely self-sustaining, fully solar-powered, and, naturally, a triumph of private enterprise. It would’ve been the most beautiful sink, a masterpiece of human ingenuity, a monument to the pioneering spirit of those daring enough to bypass the government’s limp hand. But alas, the red tape strangled our vision! The bureaucrats couldn’t possibly grasp the brilliance of draining Valencia’s floods to, oh, let’s say, Australia. No, the permits were delayed, the environmental impact studies became “essential,” and the whole glorious concept sank before it ever even saw a drop of water.

1. Airbnb Climate Shelters – Because nothing says climate resilience like overpriced, short-term rentals in flooded zones.

2. Uber for Boats – On-demand rides in floodwaters with “surge pricing” based on depth and urgency.

3. Meal Kits for Climate Crises – Fresh, gourmet meals delivered weekly (when delivery routes aren’t underwater).

4. WeWork Disaster Coworking Spaces – Pop-up coworking lounges where the A/C is blasting, while the world outside swelters.

5. IoT Smart Sandbags – App-controlled sandbags that alert you when water breaches (but, naturally, require Wi-Fi).

6. Blockchain for Disaster AidCrypto-based aid where donations take weeks to verify, but hey, they’re “secure.”

7.Climate-Tracking Wearables – Wristbands that warn you of the heat… if you weren’t already melting outside.

9. Virtual Reality Evacuation Drills – Practice fleeing disasters in VR, no real-world infrastructure needed.

10. NFT Carbon Offsets – Collectible offsets, “backed” by vague promises to plant trees… someday.

11. Electric Scooters for Hurricanes – Hop on an electric scooter and, if you’re lucky, escape a hurricane one block at a time.

12. AI Flood Prediction Apps – Real-time flood prediction that sends alerts just in time for you to swim for higher ground.

13. Subscription-Based Fire Escape Ladders – Rent your escape ladder for an affordable monthly fee, billed until you cancel.

14. Augmented Reality Home Repairs – View potential repairs through your phone screen while your roof blows off in a storm.

15. Bespoke Luxury Survival Kits – Designer kits for climate resilience, complete with a gold-plated can opener.

16. Pay-Per-Use Solar Chargers – Rentable phone chargers for post-blackout areas, only a dollar per minute.

17. Insurance for Your Insurance – Premium protection plans for your flood or fire insurance, just in case that company goes bust.

18. Climate Crisis Networking App – Meet other disaster survivors in your area and collaborate… for a monthly fee.

19.Subscription Water Rationing Service – Get access to water deliveries during shortages if you subscribe at the premium tier.

Fear and Loathing In The Campaign

I am a many-issues voter. By now, I want them all to lose, every last one of them. Putin and Zelensky can tango into obscurity, locked forever in some insane echo chamber of their own making, each one screaming “Traitor!” into the other’s face. Trump and Harris? They should lose in such spectacular fashion that even their base camps burn the banners and start denying they ever supported them. And Netanyahu? Oh, Bibi should lose big. He should lose in biblical proportions, a plummeting fall so epic that even the sea would refuse to part for him.

If I had my way, here’s how it’d go: Netanyahu, grinning like a fox in a junkyard, somehow lands himself the U.S. presidency. 

But the glory is short-lived, as he’s swiftly brought down in a cascade of indictments — a conspiracy so vast even Oliver Stone wouldn’t touch it. He’s taken down by the very FBI he’s spent years trying to undermine, escorted off in handcuffs as the cameras roll. A tragic hero brought down by his own bad karma — or maybe just lousy luck.

Netanyahu, seeing his American power base slipping, tries to activate his old contacts in the New York and New Jersey mob — relics from his younger days when influence was just a handshake away. But what he finds is a shadow of what it used to be. The mob’s younger generation is more interested in crypto than concrete, and the old guard barely remembers his name. Desperation turns to exasperation as he realizes that his once-mighty influence now holds all the power of a rain-soaked match. All that swagger and bluster, wasted on ghosts of a power structure that’s faded to nothing.

Then there’s Putin and Zelensky. Ah, those two, bound together like a pair of drunks trying to stand. They swap sides, each wearing the other’s slogans and scripts, delivering their speeches like bad actors in a tragicomedy. Zelensky, looking dour in a fur hat, swigs vodka and speaks in cryptic, icy soundbites, while Putin throws on a T-shirt, flashes a peace sign, and pretends he’s running a late-night telethon for freedom. Each one so lost in the other’s rhetoric they’re practically begging for someone to end the nightmare.

In a twist of fate straight out of a vodka-fueled fever dream, they discover they share a babushka who hasn’t minced words since the days of Stalin. This woman is a tornado wrapped in a shawl, appearing at their joint press conference with a half-empty bottle of brandy and an unfiltered mouth. She proceeds to tear into them both — berating Zelensky for not calling, cursing Putin for every lie he’s told since birth. By the end, both men look like chastened schoolboys, heads down as she delivers a riot act so fierce it makes the Seder plates rattle. She wobbles off into the wings, muttering curses as they slink away, bewildered and shamed.

Harris, naturally, becomes president of Israel. She’s flown in with great fanfare, her advisors furiously flipping through Hebrew dictionaries. She takes the stage in Tel Aviv, and when the crowd expects something grand, she offers her trademark cackle, echoing like a ghost across the desert. Policy? Who needs policy? It’s all in the tone, baby, expecting to bring her brand of progressive optimism, only to discover that she’s been handed an ethnonationalist cabinet armed with every weapon she’s rubber-stamped over the years. Her appointees sneer at her idealism, rolling their eyes as she talks of diplomacy and “healing the rift.” She’s got all the tools, but none of the support, and each attempt at reform only throws more fuel onto the simmering fire of resentment. So there she stands, like a deer in headlights, trying to reason with generals whose main interest is a clenched fist, and cabinet members who view peace like it’s a punchline.

And Trump? Ah, here’s the pièce de résistance. Trump is sent to the Holy Land — specifically, Gaza and the West Bank. His new role: head of the Palestinian Authority. Day one, he takes to the podium, barely suppressing a grimace as he belts out, “Allahu Akbar!” Cameras flash, jaws drop. He’s got plans, you see. He’s going to turn the place into a Bedouin paradise, a 24-karat oasis of gaudy domes and velvet-rope VIP sections. The Dome of the Rock Resort & Casino — a dazzling monument to his vision. Camel rides for the kids, blackjack tables for the adults, and a nightly fireworks display that would have Moses rolling over in his grave.

It’s a Las Vegas mirage rising from the dunes, complete with golden towers, rooftop pools, and camel rides in the courtyard. The trouble? The sand won’t hold the weight of his fantasy, and every new construction sinks just a little deeper. Undeterred, he declares it “the best casino the Middle East has ever seen,” as the walls start to shift and collapse. By the time it’s half-built, it’s already

This is the political circus we’ve been condemned to, the theater of the absurd where every player’s a caricature, every promise is a punchline. But hey, at least it’d be a hell of a show.

Disclaimer

Any mention of human rights in this statement applies selectively and is generally contingent upon geopolitical convenience. We would like to clarify that “universal” human rights claims may not universally apply and are subject to selective enforcement. Specific populations, such as the Palestinians, may experience inconsistencies in the application of these rights due to complex and evolving priorities, including but not limited to political alliances, historical narratives, and the definition of “ally.”

While we recognize that humanitarian values are cited as a guiding force, these values are enforced on a case-by-case basis, especially when expedient for Western interests. Please note that condemnation and concern for human rights may be invoked, postponed, or omitted entirely depending on factors like strategic interests, economic considerations, and popular narratives.

In short, “human rights for all” has, in this context, various exclusions, exemptions, and disclaimers—some assembly required.

We further acknowledge that selective concern may result in intensified rhetoric, where one group’s suffering is amplified while another’s is minimized or reframed as “too complex” for unequivocal support. This selective empathy aligns with the latest moral algorithms, which occasionally deprioritize human rights considerations in areas deemed politically sensitive. As a result, the concept of human rights may appear inconsistently applied, but rest assured, this approach remains consistent with long-standing traditions of expedient advocacy.

Moreover, Western audiences are gently reminded that expressions of solidarity and outrage are often tailored for maximal resonance with existing alliances, thus avoiding undue discomfort or confrontation. All public statements are crafted with careful attention to the values of liberty, justice, and freedom—as long as these do not interfere with existing defense contracts, resource access, or the stability of favorable governments.

In closing, please remember that any perceived hypocrisy in this policy is merely an unfortunate byproduct of balancing ethics with pragmatism. Human rights are, as ever, both essential and selectively optional.

Democrats and the Subjunctive

The American HuperObject

In American political discourse, much is made of the divide between Democrats and Republicans. Both are painted as polar opposites, with one representing progressive ideals and the other standing for conservative values. But when we strip away the surface, both parties operate within the same framework: the American Hyperobject. This Hyperobject, a concept introduced by philosopher Timothy Morton, refers to something so vast and complex that it defies individual understanding. In the case of American politics, it is the Empire itself—an intricate web of corporate interests, military power, and global influence that transcends party lines. It’s the machinery that drives both sides, no matter what language they use to justify their actions.

The Subjunctive Democrats

The Democratic Party, often cast as the party of progress and reform, frequently uses language that leans heavily on the subjunctive mood. The subjunctive is a grammatical form that expresses wishes, hypothetical situations, or conditions contrary to fact. In Democratic rhetoric, this takes the shape of grand visions of what could be, but so rarely what is. “If we were to secure universal healthcare…” “Were we to pass immigration reform…” These statements dangle possibilities in front of voters, but they remain suspended in a realm of hypothetical action, rarely materializing into reality.

This subjunctive framing allows Democrats to maintain a sense of idealism while evading accountability for not achieving their goals. It gives them space to come back every four or eight years, repainting the Empire with a fresh coat of promises, while never having to confront the system itself. Instead, they offer a kind of corporate McKinsey makeover, rebranding policies without addressing the underlying structures. The McKinsey approach isn’t about fixing what’s wrong; it’s about managing perceptions, making people feel as though something is being done when, in truth, very little changes.

The Faux Indicative Republicans

If the Democrats exist in the subjunctive, it would be tempting to frame Republicans as the party of the indicative—straightforward, action-oriented, and direct. But this too is an illusion. Republicans often present themselves as tough, decisive, and libertarian in spirit. They talk of small government, deregulation, and individual freedom. Yet, in practice, what they do is often the opposite. Their policies tend to reinforce power structures, setting up corporate stooges and expanding governmental control over personal freedoms in ways that contradict their rhetoric.

Like the Democrats, Republicans have their own form of McKinsey-style makeup. They cloak themselves in the language of toughness and libertarianism, but underneath, they serve the same interests as their opponents—those of Empire and the corporate elite. They pretend to act decisively, but what they actually accomplish is a reinforcement of the status quo, merely packaged in a different aesthetic. Their ‘toughness’ becomes another performance, a means of managing expectations while continuing to expand the power of the Hyperobject.

The American Hyperobject

What we’re talking about, then, isn’t just two parties with different philosophies. It’s the American Hyperobject—a massive, sprawling entity that encompasses the military-industrial complex, multinational corporations, financial markets, and a foreign policy rooted in maintaining global dominance. It’s so large that it’s hard to see all at once, and it operates regardless of which party is in power. The Democrats may promise a kinder, gentler empire, while Republicans talk of a stronger, more independent nation, but neither truly disrupts the system they serve.

Both parties apply their own versions of McKinsey spin to the Empire. The Democrats appeal to voters with the hypothetical, the subjunctive dreams of what might be possible if only they had more power. Republicans, on the other hand, sell a fantasy of rugged individualism and small government while expanding the state’s power in practice. Both are different expressions of the same reality: they are managing the Hyperobject, not dismantling or even significantly altering it.

Conclusion

The American political system, as it currently exists, functions less as a battle of ideas and more as a maintenance of the status quo. Both parties engage in performances designed to manage the perception of change, without ever fundamentally addressing the Hyperobject that governs the structure of Empire. Democrats lean on the subjunctive, offering a future that never quite arrives. Republicans adopt the guise of the indicative, pretending to take decisive action while merely reshuffling the same players. In the end, both are simply keeping the machinery of Empire well-oiled, maintaining the American Hyperobject in all its overwhelming, inescapable complexity.

What’s the Cosmos Punchline You Are Waiting For?

I keep waiting for the punchline. A cosmic punchline, to be specific. Maybe a booming voice from the heavens to drop the gag and clear the smoke, because it sure as hell can’t be real. What kind of sick joke have we wandered into this time? The war in Ukraine—stalemated and bloody, grinding on like a meat grinder with no off switch—set to the dull roar of geopolitics played by armchair generals with more hair dye than brains. Then there’s Palestine, where “genocide” is the polite word we use to describe the meticulous erasure of a people. And all while the U.S. political machinery—once marketed as the Last Bastion of Freedom™—has choked on its own gridlock, content to sip cocktails with the very capital that’s designed the mess. All of it. Every bit of it.

Is this the great cosmic joke? The punchline so dry, so dark, you can barely hear it over the drone strikes and CNBC stock tickers?

Let’s start with Ukraine. It’s 2024, and yet here we are—watching Cold War reruns but in high-def. Russia stumbles into a war it thought would last weeks, but now the landscape is littered with bodies and rusted tanks as far as the eye can see. And what’s on the other side? The West, doling out arms with the subtlety of a blackjack dealer at a casino, waiting to see how many chips they can lose before the house explodes. Everyone’s playing the long game, except for the Ukrainians who don’t have the luxury of games—they’re playing survival. But hey, war is great for business. The defense contractors are licking their chops like they just found out Santa Claus is real and his sack is full of billion-dollar contracts. Cha-ching.

Then we glance toward Palestine. What’s there to say that hasn’t been whitewashed already? Words like “war crimes” and “ethnic cleansing” float around like balloons at a child’s party—except the party’s been over for 75 years, and there’s blood on the floor. The bodies pile up, but somehow it’s never the right time to talk about it. “Complex situation,” they say. It’s about as “complex” as a brick wall hitting you in the face. Israel’s playing chess with bulldozers, while Palestine gets checkers with rocks. And the world watches with a kind of selective amnesia—Oh, is that still happening? Yes, Karen. It’s still happening, and it’s going to keep happening until someone remembers that human rights aren’t an item on a “to-do” list.

And while we’re distracted by the explosions, we’ve got the good ol’ USA trying to be the referee in a game where it lost the whistle years ago. I mean, gridlock politics has always been a joke—two parties, equally corrupt, with the collective foresight of a goldfish on meth. But now it’s a full-on parody. You can’t even get these jokers to agree on funding their own government, let alone tackle climate change or fix healthcare. The elephant and the donkey are so deep into their wrestling match, they don’t even realize they’re both choking on the same chain—the one tied to Wall Street and Silicon Valley, keeping them nice and tame. Don’t worry, folks, democracy’s just taking a nap. For the next 50 years.

But hey, at least the capital’s doing fine, right? Cozy up to it. Pour it a drink. Capital doesn’t care if you’re Republican, Democrat, or a libertarian freak who thinks Bitcoin is the second coming of Jesus. It just wants to be stroked and fed, like a fat, lazy cat that can still somehow land on its feet every time. Hell, it’s already one step ahead. While we’re all doom-scrolling and arguing over whose fault it is that the world’s on fire, capital is already planning its next vacation to Mars. Elon Musk is building rockets while the world burns, and I swear he’s doing it just to rub our faces in it.

The cosmos has to have a punchline for this. There has to be something coming at the end—some grand, twisted laugh from the universe itself. Otherwise, what are we even doing here? Watching atrocities on YouTube while eating takeout. Arguing online in a digital Tower of Babel where everyone’s shouting into the void and no one’s listening. Maybe the joke’s on us.

Or maybe the joke is us.

Cosmic absurdity would be a mercy at this point. A giggle from the gods, some divine laughter rolling down the heavens to let us know it’s all been one big cosmic farce. But we aren’t so lucky. There’s no laugh track. No curtain call. Just the blood-soaked ground and the drone of machines, churning on and on.

What’s the punchline you’re waiting for?

NATO’s Two Bit hustles

NATO’s a two-bit hustle, baby, masquerading as global protector—an old-school patriarchy racket. Think of it as a high-rise corporate pimp: suits on top, chaos underneath. They sell you security, but they’re the ones dangling the knife at your throat. Make a mess in your backyard, blame it on the neighbors, and come in with the bulldozers. Give you just enough help to keep you dependent—like a junkie begging for one more hit, one more round of protection money.

Old boys’ club calling the shots, a little wink and nudge over the heads of the nations lining up like good little soldiers. Keep the gears oiled with war games and broken promises. Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya—those were test runs. Softening the borders, planting the flags. They’ll tell you it’s about democracy, but it’s about territory, baby. Territories and tax breaks for the elites. Make a deal, break a treaty, slide the blame onto the next poor bastard that didn’t see the strings being pulled.

NATO’s the abusive father at the head of the dinner table, right? Acts like he’s keeping the family together, but he’s only keeping them in line. The kind of guy who takes credit for every crumb of food on your plate, but you know damn well he’s the one who locked the pantry. When you ask for a little freedom, he gives you a leash instead—just long enough to think you’re walking free, but when you hit the end of that rope, he yanks hard.

He’s got the brothers—Europe, Canada—sitting there, quiet as church mice, not daring to raise their heads. They know the deal: speak out of turn, and the old man’s belt comes off. But he’s got his favorites too. Oh yeah, the golden child—maybe it’s the UK, maybe Turkey on a good day—gets to sit close, gets a pat on the back, while the others get scraps. But don’t be fooled—he’ll turn on them too. No loyalty in a tyrant’s heart, just control and the fear that someone might finally break the chain.

And let’s not forget the neighborhood. He’s got eyes everywhere, patrolling the streets like some self-appointed sheriff. The Balkans? Baltic states? They’re the kids on the block, watching him swagger around, knowing he can make life hell if they step out of line. He’s the guy who comes over and pretends to fix your fence, but leaves just enough damage so you’ll need him again next year.

Every so often, he’ll blow up at some distant cousin—Russia, Iran—just to remind the rest of the family who’s boss. It’s all a power play. But like any tyrant, his real fear is that the kids will figure him out one day, gang up, and take him down.

It’s all a con. NATO’s the biggest fixer in town. Keep the world spinning, but only just enough to keep you dizzy, docile, and desperate for their version of peace. And when the smoke clears? They’ll still be standing, counting up the chips, while the rest of the world foots the bill.

Jesus Figures and the Marriage of High Testosterone + Neurodivergent

The relentless search for contemporary “Jesus figures” to deliver us from the oppressive grip of “the man” reveals a profound discontent with the existing ideological structure, one that is emblematic of our late capitalist condition. This can be interpreted as the collective’s desperate attempt to fill the void of the objet petit a—the unattainable object of desire, that which is always missing. This figure is expected to embody the lost cause, the pure subject who, untainted by the symbolic order, can somehow lead us to redemption.

But why the specific allure of high testosterone combined with neurodivergence? Here, we encounter a fascinating inversion reminiscent of Nietzsche’s “slave morality,” but with a distinctly postmodern twist. In classical slave morality, the oppressed transmute their weakness into a kind of moral superiority. Now, however, in a world where traditional masculinity and conformity to societal norms have been pathologized, the outcast—the one who refuses to conform to the master signifier of late capitalist normalcy—becomes the hero. This is not merely a Nietzschean reversal but a symptom of a deeper crisis in the symbolic order itself.

We could argue that this new archetype reflects an underlying anxiety in the collective unconscious. The traditional hero—rational, composed, and aligned with the symbolic law—no longer resonates in a world that feels increasingly chaotic and unmoored. Instead, we project our desire for liberation onto figures who seem to operate outside the law, who embody the raw, untamed forces that the symbolic order attempts to repress. This is the real of the neurodivergent, whose very existence is a challenge to the seamless functioning of the ideological apparatus.

Yet, this elevation of the neurodivergent, high-testosterone figure is fraught with contradictions. Is this not the ultimate fetishization of the symptom? By glorifying those who resist or are marginalized by the dominant order, we risk reinforcing the very structures we seek to escape. We are mistaking the symptom—the visible sign of our discontent—for the cure. The neurodivergent, high-testosterone savior is but another fantasy, another screen onto which we project our desire for a new master, one who can somehow deliver us from the contradictions of our existence without fundamentally altering the underlying structure.

Thus, the search for these “Jesus figures” reveals less about the potential for genuine liberation and more about our inability to confront the true nature of our discontent. We cling to the hope that someone from outside the system can save us, while refusing to acknowledge that it is the system itself that must be transformed. In this way, the marriage of high testosterone and neurodivergence becomes a new slave morality, one that allows us to critique the system while remaining safely within its bounds, never fully challenging the symbolic order that defines our reality.

Civilization’s Last Stand: Charter Networks

So all the talk about civilization was just about charter cities and charter schools. They sold you a bill of goods wrapped in the shining veneer of civilization, the grand promise of order, progress, and prosperity. But what did they give you? Not the grand city on a hill, but a shantytown of grifters playing at governance, shuffling paper laws like marked cards, dealing out a stacked deck of regulations to prop up their own games. Ah, Charter Networks—the fresh guise of modern civilization’s latest masquerade. You see, it’s not just about charter cities and charter schools anymore. No, no, that was merely the opening act. Now, the spectacle has evolved into something far more insidious: Charter Networks. An elaborate tapestry woven from the threads of private enterprise and governance, designed to ensnare and extract every last drop of value from the collective body politic.

Civilization? Oh, it’s civilization alright—if you define civilization as a network of private enclaves, each one its own little fiefdom, ruled by the masters of the universe who think that the only thing keeping us from paradise is a few more well-placed rules, designed by the well-heeled and the well-fed for their own well-being.

You see, it’s all very airtight. Development is a function of laws, they say. Bad regulations stifle progress, while good rules unleash it. And who decides what’s good and what’s bad? Well, the same people who benefit from the ‘good’ rules, naturally. The same people who amassed their power and fortune under the very norms they now want to tear down in favor of new, shinier, more profitable regulations. These are the civilization people, the ones who talk big about order and development while operating under a system that’s as corrupt as a back-alley dice game.

What’s the trick? It’s simple. Persuade the rest of us to buy into the idea that we’re operating a country based on a set of corrupt norms. No small feat, considering those norms are the very ones that got these civilization folks where they are today. They want you to believe that the reason you’re not living in a utopia is because you’re clinging to the wrong rules, the old rules, the ones that just don’t work anymore. But don’t worry— they’ve got the fix. All you have to do is hand over the keys to the kingdom and trust them to rebuild the system. A new system, with new rules, designed just for you. Or rather, designed just for them, but they’ll tell you it’s for you.

It’s not about nurturing curiosity or critical thinking—it’s about creating a perfectly obedient labor force that can be easily slotted into the pre-existing hierarchical structure.

Look closely at these charter cities, these charter schools. They’re the laboratories where they test their theories, their little experiments in governance. They say it’s about efficiency, about breaking free from the constraints of a bloated, bureaucratic state. But what it’s really about is control. It’s about creating a set of laws and norms that they can manipulate to their own ends, to create a new world order where they hold all the cards and everyone else is just along for the ride.

But the pièce de résistance is the Charter Networks themselves. These sprawling conglomerates of privatized governance extend their tendrils into every facet of life. They are the new ruling class, shaping everything from local zoning laws to global trade agreements. It’s a network of interconnected power structures where the lines between private interests and public policy blur into a nightmarish miasma of corruption. They sell you the illusion of choice, while systematically dismantling the very institutions that might stand in their way.

The language is crucial here—because language, as always, is the weapon of the ruling elite. They talk about “innovation,” “efficiency,” and “disruption” as if these were sacred values, as if they weren’t just buzzwords for the systematic dismantling of democratic institutions. They wax poetic about “entrepreneurial spirit” and “market solutions,” conveniently ignoring that their so-called solutions are designed to benefit them, not you. They create a facade of dynamism while preserving a rigid and impenetrable system of privilege.

But let’s not pretend this is new. It’s the oldest trick in the book, dressed up in modern clothes. The powerful have always justified their rule by claiming to be the architects of civilization, the bearers of progress. They’ve always used the law as a tool to maintain their power, bending and twisting it to suit their needs. The difference now is that they’re doing it out in the open, with a smile on their faces and a promise of a better tomorrow. It’s all a grand illusion, a sleight of hand for the new digital age. Charter Networks are the modern equivalent of the feudal estates of yore, with their own set of rules and their own internal logic. They are the culmination of a centuries-old project to concentrate wealth and power into the hands of a few, dressed up in a shiny new coat of techno-libertarian rhetoric.

The real joke, though, is on them. Because no matter how much they try to dress it up, no matter how many charter cities and charter schools they build, they can’t escape the fundamental truth: civilization isn’t a set of laws. It’s not something you can legislate or regulate into existence. Civilization is a collective endeavor, a fragile web of relationships and shared understandings. It’s messy, chaotic, and often contradictory. But it’s real, and it’s something that can’t be engineered from the top down.

So go ahead, civilization people. Build your charter cities, rewrite your laws, play your games. But don’t be surprised when the rest of us don’t buy in. Because we see through the charade. We know that civilization isn’t about rules and regulations—it’s about people, about communities, about the messy, complicated business of living together in a shared world. And that’s something you can’t legislate, no matter how many charter cities you build.

So, as you navigate this brave new world of Charter Networks, remember one thing: you’re not witnessing a revolution. You’re witnessing a heist—a grand theft of public resources and democratic freedoms, repackaged as progress. The only thing that’s new here is the technology used to pull it off. The underlying game remains as old as the hills: the powerful consolidate, and the rest are left to scramble in the ruins.

And as for the civilization they keep touting—well, it’s a civilization for the chosen few, not for the likes of you. The Charter Networks are the final insult, the last betrayal of the very idea of a common good. So, don’t be fooled by the shiny rhetoric. Behind the glossy facade of progress and innovation lies the same old story: a rigged game where the house always wins.